On normalization of inconsistency indicators in pairwise comparisons

On normalization of inconsistency indicators in pairwise comparisons

In this study, we provide mathematical and practice-driven justification for using [0,1] normalization of inconsistency indicators in pairwise comparisons. The need for normalization, as well as problems with the lack of normalization, are presented. A new type of paradox of infinity is described.

Axiomatization of inconsistency indicators for pairwise comparisons

This study proposes axioms for inconsistency indicators in pairwise comparisons. The new observation (by Szybowski), that “no PC submatrix may have a worse inconsistency indicator than the given PC matrix” is an essential simplification of the axiomatization. The goal of formulating axioms for all future definitions of new inconsistency indicators is difficult and as illusive as the inconsisten...

On Axiomatization of Inconsistency Indicators for Pairwise Comparisons

This study examines the notion of inconsistency in pairwise comparisons for providing an axiomatization for it. It also proposes two inconsistency indicators for pairwise comparisons. The primary motivation for the inconsistency reduction is expressed by a computer industry concept “garbage in, garbage out”. The quality of the output depends on the quality of the input.

On Inconsistency Indices and Inconsistency Axioms in Pairwise Comparisons

Pairwise comparisons are an important tool of modern (multiple criteria) decision making. Since human judgments are often inconsistent, many studies focused on the ways how to express and measure this inconsistency, and several inconsistency indices were proposed as an alternative to Saaty’s inconsistency index and inconsistency ratio for reciprocal pairwise comparisons matrices. This paper aim...

On inconsistency of a pairwise comparison matrix